Wisconsin court election tests Musk’s influence as political kingmaker

Just five months after a fiercely contested election, Wisconsin voters are once again heading to the polls—this time for a high-stakes battle over a vacancy on the state’s Supreme Court.

The race has become the most expensive judicial contest in U.S. history, with spending surpassing $90 million.

At the center of the contest is billionaire Elon Musk, whose name does not appear on the ballot but whose influence looms large.

Musk and affiliated groups have poured $20 million into the race, backing conservative candidate Brad Schimel.

The former state attorney general has also secured the endorsement of former President Donald Trump, reinforcing his ties to right-wing political circles.

On the opposing side is liberal candidate Susan Crawford, a judge and former legal advisor to Democratic leaders.

She has garnered support from former President Barack Obama and left-leaning donors, including billionaire philanthropist George Soros.

The ideological battle for the court seat could have far-reaching consequences for Wisconsin, a crucial swing state where judicial rulings frequently shape national debates.

Issues such as abortion rights, redistricting, and election laws are all expected to come before the state’s highest court in the near future.

“This election will determine whether Wisconsin’s judiciary remains conservative or shifts to the left,” said political analyst Daniel Becker.

“With major national figures and record-breaking money pouring in, it’s clear that both parties see this as a critical fight.”

Early voting turnout has been high, reflecting the intense interest in the race. Some voters expressed concerns over the increasing influence of outside money in state judicial races.

“The courts should be impartial, not bought by billionaires,” said Madison resident Lisa Franklin.

As the race nears its conclusion, both sides are ramping up efforts to mobilize voters. With such a vast ideological divide between the candidates, the outcome could reshape Wisconsin’s judicial landscape for years to come.